Chapter IV. Croatia (CROSBI ID 68521)
Prilog u knjizi | izvorni znanstveni rad | međunarodna recenzija
Podaci o odgovornosti
Kmieciak, Zbigniew ; Rathmanner, Laura R. ; Chvosta, Peter ; Đerđa, Dario ; Frumarová, Kateřina ; Patyi, András ; Wojtuń, Maciej ; Wegner, Joanna ; Vučetić, Dejan ; Vačok, Juraj ; Žuber, Bruna ; Krawczyk, Agnieszka ; Auby, Jean- Bernard ; della Cananea, Giacinto
engleski
Chapter IV. Croatia
From the current point of view, it could be emphasised that GAPA was largely responsive to the challenges that existed at the time of its adoption. It simplified the conduct of administrative procedures and enabled officials to be more creative when undertaking procedural actions. At the same time, it insisted on the legality of the administrative authorities’ work. It established procedural mechanisms to expedite administrative adjudication, as well as various models of legal protection of individual’s rights. Therefore, GAPA can, in principle, be considered very good law, which does not raise urgent issues that would require longterm improvements in its regulation. Finally, while Croatia has a well- structured procedural framework for conducting administrative procedures that reflects Croatia 103 both tradition and modernisation, in order to achieve the values of administration in the service of the citizens, it must focus on the systematic education and professional development of officials, who contribute the most to the correct implementation of GAPA in practice.
administrative procedures ; Croatia
nije evidentirano
nije evidentirano
nije evidentirano
nije evidentirano
nije evidentirano
nije evidentirano
Podaci o prilogu
89-105.
objavljeno
10.18778/8220-065-2
Podaci o knjizi
Administrative Proceedings in the Habsburg Succession Countries
Kmieciak, Zbigniew
Łódź : Varšava: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego ; Wolters Kluwer
2020.
978-83-8220-065-2