Nalazite se na CroRIS probnoj okolini. Ovdje evidentirani podaci neće biti pohranjeni u Informacijskom sustavu znanosti RH. Ako je ovo greška, CroRIS produkcijskoj okolini moguće je pristupi putem poveznice www.croris.hr
izvor podataka: crosbi

The Bruce Willis of sandwiches: The Y of X is Y of Z construction on its journey towards a paragon model, as one way of achieving intersubjectivity (CROSBI ID 287855)

Prilog u časopisu | izvorni znanstveni rad | međunarodna recenzija

Brdar-Szabó, Rita ; Brdar, Mario The Bruce Willis of sandwiches: The Y of X is Y of Z construction on its journey towards a paragon model, as one way of achieving intersubjectivity // Revista Diadorim, 22 (2020), 2; 277-302. doi: 10.35520/diadorim.2020.v22n2a39460

Podaci o odgovornosti

Brdar-Szabó, Rita ; Brdar, Mario

engleski

The Bruce Willis of sandwiches: The Y of X is Y of Z construction on its journey towards a paragon model, as one way of achieving intersubjectivity

The present article is concerned with innovative metaphorical expressions with proper nouns in a subtype of so-caled XYZ constructions, such as Is sad singleton Vladimir Putin the Jennifer Aniston of European politics?, which link relatively disparate domains and which may cause interpretation difficulties, leading to the problem known as de Saussure’s paradox. Veale (2014) believes that they are “double-edged comparisons that can cut both ways, since information inevitably flows in both directions, …. to meet in the middle to construct a blended mental image.” We argue that such constructions are better explained as metaphors based on metonymic paragon models. A closer look at these constructions reveals that they are most of the time used in discourse in such a way that the speaker provides mapping-like statements justifying the pairing of X and Y: speakers create remarkable links between disparate domains on purpose, but they also attempt, in observance of the Gricean principle of cooperation, to facilitate the processing of such expressions and deliberately explicate what seem to be underlying mappings in keeping with the maxim of quantity until supplying enough information to safeguard the interpretation of the figurative expression in the direction of what they have in mind, i.e. ensuring intersubjectivity. In light of similar constructions without any explications, which can be analyzed as based on metonymic paragon models, we realize that spelling out the reasons for the pairings of proper nouns actually seems to function as a trigger for the online creation of novel paragons or quasi-paragons, or for an ad hoc modification of existing paragons. We claim that it is actually these explications that “cut both ways, ” i.e. apply to both X and Y, which means that we witness a dynamic (re)construal of meaning whereby a paragon model is strengthened or modified, or is being created.

blending ; XYZ construction ; intersubjectivity ; paragon ; mapping

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

Podaci o izdanju

22 (2)

2020.

277-302

objavljeno

2675-1216

10.35520/diadorim.2020.v22n2a39460

Povezanost rada

Filologija

Poveznice