Nalazite se na CroRIS probnoj okolini. Ovdje evidentirani podaci neće biti pohranjeni u Informacijskom sustavu znanosti RH. Ako je ovo greška, CroRIS produkcijskoj okolini moguće je pristupi putem poveznice www.croris.hr
izvor podataka: crosbi

Utjecaj smolastog premaza na otpuštanje iona iz restaurativnih materijala koji otpuštaju fluoridne ione (CROSBI ID 287211)

Prilog u časopisu | izvorni znanstveni rad | međunarodna recenzija

Kelić, Katarina ; Par, Matej ; Peroš, Kristina ; Šutej, Ivana ; Tarle, Zrinka Fluoride-Releasing Restorative Materials: the Effect of a Resinous Coat on Ion Release / Utjecaj smolastog premaza na otpuštanje iona iz restaurativnih materijala koji otpuštaju fluoridne ione // Acta stomatologica Croatica, 54 (2020), 4; 371-381. doi: 10.15644/asc54/4/4

Podaci o odgovornosti

Kelić, Katarina ; Par, Matej ; Peroš, Kristina ; Šutej, Ivana ; Tarle, Zrinka

hrvatski

Utjecaj smolastog premaza na otpuštanje iona iz restaurativnih materijala koji otpuštaju fluoridne ione

Objective: To determine the effect of two adhesive systems and a glass ionomer coating resin on fluoride release and concurrent pH changes over a period of 168 days. Material and methods: Four restorative materials were investigated: a giomer Beautiful II, an “alkasite” material Cention, a conventional composite Filtek Z250, and a glass ionomer cement Fuji IX Extra. Light-cured composite specimens were coated using G-aenial Bond and Clearfil Universal Bond Quick. Glass ionomer specimens were coated using GC Fuji Coat LC. Uncoated specimens were used as references. Quantitative fluoride release and pH changes were measured after 1 h, 24 h, 2 days, 7 days, 28 days, 84 days, and 168 days. Results: The cumulative fluoride release after 168 days increased for uncoated specimens in the following order: Filtek Z250 < Beautifil II < Cention < Fuji IX Extra. A comparatively lower fluoride release was measured for the composites coated with Clearfil Universal Bond Quick, with cumulative values after 168 days increasing in the following order: Filtek Z250 < Beautifil II < Cention. The composites coated with G-aenial Bond showed lower fluoride release compared to the uncoated specimens, with cumulative values increasing in the following order: Filtek Z250 < Beautifil II < Cention. The composites coated with G-aenial Bond showed pH values in the acidic range (4.4-5.7) after 1 h and 24 h. Conclusion: Fluoride release varied among the investigated restorative materials and depended on the use of dental adhesives and coatings. The pH of all materials, coating types and time points varied.

stomatološki cementi ; fluoridi ; koncentracija vodikovih iona ; oslobađanje lijekova

nije evidentirano

engleski

Fluoride-Releasing Restorative Materials: the Effect of a Resinous Coat on Ion Release

Objective: To determine the effect of two adhesive systems and a glass ionomer coating resin on fluoride release and concurrent pH changes over a period of 168 days. Material and methods: Four restorative materials were investigated: a giomer Beautiful II, an “alkasite” material Cention, a conventional composite Filtek Z250, and a glass ionomer cement Fuji IX Extra. Light-cured composite specimens were coated using G-aenial Bond and Clearfil Universal Bond Quick. Glass ionomer specimens were coated using GC Fuji Coat LC. Uncoated specimens were used as references. Quantitative fluoride release and pH changes were measured after 1 h, 24 h, 2 days, 7 days, 28 days, 84 days, and 168 days. Results: The cumulative fluoride release after 168 days increased for uncoated specimens in the following order: Filtek Z250 < Beautifil II < Cention < Fuji IX Extra. A comparatively lower fluoride release was measured for the composites coated with Clearfil Universal Bond Quick, with cumulative values after 168 days increasing in the following order: Filtek Z250 < Beautifil II < Cention. The composites coated with G-aenial Bond showed lower fluoride release compared to the uncoated specimens, with cumulative values increasing in the following order: Filtek Z250 < Beautifil II < Cention. The composites coated with G-aenial Bond showed pH values in the acidic range (4.4-5.7) after 1 h and 24 h. Conclusion: Fluoride release varied among the investigated restorative materials and depended on the use of dental adhesives and coatings. The pH of all materials, coating types and time points varied.

stomatološki cementi ; fluoridi ; koncentracija vodikovih iona ; oslobađanje lijekova

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

Podaci o izdanju

54 (4)

2020.

371-381

objavljeno

0001-7019

1846-0410

10.15644/asc54/4/4

Povezanost rada

Dentalna medicina

Poveznice
Indeksiranost