Nalazite se na CroRIS probnoj okolini. Ovdje evidentirani podaci neće biti pohranjeni u Informacijskom sustavu znanosti RH. Ako je ovo greška, CroRIS produkcijskoj okolini moguće je pristupi putem poveznice www.croris.hr
izvor podataka: crosbi

Ured europskog javnog tužitelja i hrvatsko kazneno pravosuđe: implementacijski zahtjevi i moguća rješenja (CROSBI ID 284384)

Prilog u časopisu | pregledni rad (znanstveni) | domaća recenzija

Bonačić, Marin Ured europskog javnog tužitelja i hrvatsko kazneno pravosuđe: implementacijski zahtjevi i moguća rješenja // Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu, 27 (2020), 1; 303-324

Podaci o odgovornosti

Bonačić, Marin

engleski

Ured europskog javnog tužitelja i hrvatsko kazneno pravosuđe: implementacijski zahtjevi i moguća rješenja

The European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) was set up in 2017, after successfully completing the legislative process that began in 2013. The EPPO is conceived as an EU body with legal personality and acts as a single office with a decentralised structure which, in addition to the central office, also operates in the participating EU Member States. Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 of 12 October 2017 implementing enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office sets certain implementing obligations for the national legal systems of those States. Although regulations are EU legal acts that are binding in their entirety and directly applicable, the EPPO Regulation nevertheless requires certain interventions for the purpose of implementation. Specifically, the Regulation refers to the application of national law to the extent that a matter is not regulated by the Regulation, prescribes certain minimum investigative powers that States should provide to the EPPO, and opts for a prosecutorial inquiry model. The paper discusses the implementation requirements that the Regulation places before the Croatian criminal justice system, especially with regard to the implementation of the Office’s structure, its material competence and the exercise of its prosecutorial and investigative powers. It considers what has been done so far, gives an overview of the proposed solutions, outlines the comparative legal solutions available, and makes suggestions for resolving some of the requirements. In this regard, the analysis shows that the powers of the Croatian State Attorney in criminal proceedings are largely in line with the requirements of the Regulation and that there are therefore no major implementation obligations.

The European Public Prosecutor’s Office ; EPPO, European Delegated Prosecutors, European Prosecutors, implementation of the EPPO Regulation ; Croatia

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

Podaci o izdanju

27 (1)

2020.

303-324

objavljeno

2459-6531

2670-9996

Povezanost rada

Pravo

Poveznice
Indeksiranost