Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1061667

Ethical content of expert recommendations for end-of-life decision-making in intensive care units: A systematic review


Špoljar, Diana; Ćurković, Marko; Gastmansc, Chris; Gordijn, Bert; Vrkić, Dina; Jozepović, Ana; Vuletić, Suzana; Tonković, Dinko; Borovečki, Ana
Ethical content of expert recommendations for end-of-life decision-making in intensive care units: A systematic review // Journal of critical care, 58 (2020), 10-19 doi:(10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.03.010) (međunarodna recenzija, pregledni rad, znanstveni)


CROSBI ID: 1061667 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
Ethical content of expert recommendations for end-of-life decision-making in intensive care units: A systematic review

Autori
Špoljar, Diana ; Ćurković, Marko ; Gastmansc, Chris ; Gordijn, Bert ; Vrkić, Dina ; Jozepović, Ana ; Vuletić, Suzana ; Tonković, Dinko ; Borovečki, Ana

Izvornik
Journal of critical care (0883-9441) 58 (2020); 10-19

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, pregledni rad, znanstveni

Ključne riječi
Intensive care units End-of-life care End-of-life decision-making Ethics

Sažetak
Purpose: Intensive care unit health care professionals must be skilled in providing end- of-life care. Crucial in this kind of care is end-of-life decision-making, which is a complex process involving a variety of stakeholders and requiring adequate justification. The aim of this systematic review is to analyse papers tackling ethical issues in relation to end-of-life decision-making in intensive care units. It explores the ethical positions, arguments and principles. Methods: A literature search was conducted in bibliographic databases and grey literature sources for the time period from1990 to 2019. The constant comparative method was used for qualitative analysis of included papers in order to identify ethical content including ethical positions, ethical arguments, and ethical principles used in decision-making process. Results: In the 15 included papers we have identified a total of 43 ethical positions. Ten positions were identified as substantive, 33 as procedural. Twelve different ethical principles emerged from the ethical arguments. The most frequently used principles are the principles of beneficence, autonomy and nonmaleficence. Conclusions: We have demonstrated that recommendations and guidelines designed specifically by intensive or critical care experts for intensive care units promote similar ethical positions, with minimal dissenting positions.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Kliničke medicinske znanosti, Javno zdravstvo i zdravstvena zaštita



POVEZANOST RADA


Projekti:
HRZZ-IP-2016-06-2721 - Vrijednosti i odluke na kraju života (VAL-DE-END) (Borovečki, Ana, HRZZ - 2016-06) ( POIROT)

Ustanove:
Medicinski fakultet, Zagreb

Poveznice na cjeloviti tekst rada:

doi

Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Špoljar, Diana; Ćurković, Marko; Gastmansc, Chris; Gordijn, Bert; Vrkić, Dina; Jozepović, Ana; Vuletić, Suzana; Tonković, Dinko; Borovečki, Ana
Ethical content of expert recommendations for end-of-life decision-making in intensive care units: A systematic review // Journal of critical care, 58 (2020), 10-19 doi:(10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.03.010) (međunarodna recenzija, pregledni rad, znanstveni)
Špoljar, D., Ćurković, M., Gastmansc, C., Gordijn, B., Vrkić, D., Jozepović, A., Vuletić, S., Tonković, D. & Borovečki, A. (2020) Ethical content of expert recommendations for end-of-life decision-making in intensive care units: A systematic review. Journal of critical care, 58, 10-19 doi:(10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.03.010).
@article{article, author = {\v{S}poljar, Diana and \'{C}urkovi\'{c}, Marko and Gastmansc, Chris and Gordijn, Bert and Vrki\'{c}, Dina and Jozepovi\'{c}, Ana and Vuleti\'{c}, Suzana and Tonkovi\'{c}, Dinko and Borove\v{c}ki, Ana}, year = {2020}, pages = {10-19}, DOI = {(10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.03.010)}, keywords = {Intensive care units End-of-life care End-of-life decision-making Ethics}, journal = {Journal of critical care}, doi = {(10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.03.010)}, volume = {58}, issn = {0883-9441}, title = {Ethical content of expert recommendations for end-of-life decision-making in intensive care units: A systematic review}, keyword = {Intensive care units End-of-life care End-of-life decision-making Ethics} }
@article{article, author = {\v{S}poljar, Diana and \'{C}urkovi\'{c}, Marko and Gastmansc, Chris and Gordijn, Bert and Vrki\'{c}, Dina and Jozepovi\'{c}, Ana and Vuleti\'{c}, Suzana and Tonkovi\'{c}, Dinko and Borove\v{c}ki, Ana}, year = {2020}, pages = {10-19}, DOI = {(10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.03.010)}, keywords = {Intensive care units End-of-life care End-of-life decision-making Ethics}, journal = {Journal of critical care}, doi = {(10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.03.010)}, volume = {58}, issn = {0883-9441}, title = {Ethical content of expert recommendations for end-of-life decision-making in intensive care units: A systematic review}, keyword = {Intensive care units End-of-life care End-of-life decision-making Ethics} }

Časopis indeksira:


  • Current Contents Connect (CCC)
  • Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
    • Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
    • SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
  • Scopus
  • MEDLINE


Citati:





    Contrast
    Increase Font
    Decrease Font
    Dyslexic Font