Nalazite se na CroRIS probnoj okolini. Ovdje evidentirani podaci neće biti pohranjeni u Informacijskom sustavu znanosti RH. Ako je ovo greška, CroRIS produkcijskoj okolini moguće je pristupi putem poveznice www.croris.hr
izvor podataka: crosbi

Poor Agreement Between Two Commonly Used Measures of Shame- and Guilt-Proneness (CROSBI ID 278198)

Prilog u časopisu | izvorni znanstveni rad | međunarodna recenzija

Eterović, Marija ; Medved, Vesna ; Bilić, Vedran ; Kozarić-Kovačić, Dragica ; Žarković, Neven Poor Agreement Between Two Commonly Used Measures of Shame- and Guilt-Proneness // Journal of personality assessment, 102 (2020), 4; 499-507. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2019.1585361

Podaci o odgovornosti

Eterović, Marija ; Medved, Vesna ; Bilić, Vedran ; Kozarić-Kovačić, Dragica ; Žarković, Neven

engleski

Poor Agreement Between Two Commonly Used Measures of Shame- and Guilt-Proneness

This study sought to assess the agreement between commonly used measures of shame- and guilt- proneness, the Test of Self-Conscious Affect–3 (TOSCA–3), representing scenario measures, and the Personal Feelings Questionnaire–2 (PFQ–2), representing checklist measures. To overcome the limitations of the widely used correlation analysis, the 2 measures were compared by the Bland–Altman method. We administered both measures at once to the same sample of 138 graduate students (67.39% were female ; median age = 27 years). A randomly selected sample of 46 students repeated the procedure 8 weeks later. We tested how well our data fit the hypothesized measurement models, analyzed internal consistency of measures, evaluated their repeatability, and analyzed the agreement between them. To account for the different ranges, both measures’ scores were expressed as the percentages of their maxima. The observed data fit the proposed models well. Both measures showed good internal consistency and repeatability. In the shame domain, TOSCA–3 exceeded PFQ–2 scores by 22.32% on average (49.81, –5.13% ; 95% limits of agreement), and even more in the guilt domain, by 38.4% (67.75, 8.20%). Our results question the often-assumed congruence of the shame domains assessed by scenario and checklist measures.

shame- and guilt-proneness ; TOSCA-3 ; PFQ-2

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

Podaci o izdanju

102 (4)

2020.

499-507

objavljeno

0022-3891

1532-7752

10.1080/00223891.2019.1585361

Povezanost rada

Temeljne medicinske znanosti

Poveznice
Indeksiranost