hrvatski

Arbitraža po uzoru na rimsko pravo u graničnom sporu između Lovrana i Mošćenica (1646.)

Granični spor između Lovrana i Mošćenica iz 1646. godine poznat je u literaturi, dok je arhivski izvor u kojemu je zabilježen paleografski i filološki odgovarajuće obrađen i vrednovan. Premda je riječ o pravnom aktu, njegova je pravna odrednica nepoznata, što se posebno odnosi na nekoliko instituta, pojmova i izričaja koji svojom preciznošću, određenošću i pravnotehničkom izraženošću odudaraju od mjesnih feudalnih običajnih pravnih shvaćanja toga vremena. K tome, premda su ti pojmovi te izričaji u ispravi dokumentirani na talijanskome, oni su prigodno talijanizirani, a zapravo pripadaju latinskom jeziku. Dodatno, kada se spominju, oni odstupaju od uobičajene srednjovjekovne deskriptivnosti pravnoga jezika i administrativno-funkcionalnog stila kojima obiluje tadašnja pravna diplomatika. Kako sve navedene naznake upućuju na mogućnost da su ključni pojmovi, izričaji i instituti u lovransko-mošćeničkom razgraničenju preuzeti iz rimske pravne tradicije koja je na ovo područje prodirala i posredstvom ius commune te dijelom iz rimsko-kanonskoga procesa, u radu se propituje njihovo pravno podrijetlo te uloga i svrha koja se njihovim korištenjem postizala u konkretnom razgraničenju. U radu se posebna pažnja posvećuje procesnom mehanizmu kojim je riješen granični spor između Lovrana i Mošćenica te mogućnosti da je on oblikovan po uzoru na rimsku arbitražu iThe boundary dispute between Lovran and Mošćenice of 1646 quite recently received some attention in the literature and was simultaneously adequately elaborated form palaeographic and philological point of view. Despite the fact that it is substantially a legal act, its legal content did not receive adequate attention of the scholars, which may primarily be said with reference to its institutes, terms and expressions whose precision, accuracy and legal technical at first sight most evidently depart from the local feudal legal customs and legal traditions. Moreover, nevertheless that these terms and expressions were written down in Italian language of the time, they evidently represent Italianized version of terms, expression and legal concepts that originally belong to Latin language. Additionally, their mentions in the document at hand have no resemblance to the usual medieval descriptions of the legal phenomena which have a little in common with normative language or to administrativefunctional style of that time which distinctively shaped the legal documents. Because all these indications suggest that the key terms, expressions and institutes pertinent to the boundary dispute between Lovran and Mošćenice (and its resolution) might be borrowed from the Roman legal tradition (which outreached this territory by means of ius commune) and the Romano-canonical process, this paper examines origin, roles and functions which were achieved in practice by their use in this particular legal matter. The paper will specifically explore the procedural mechanism which was employed to reach settlement of the boundary dispute between Lovran and Mošćenice and will additionally provide a deeper insight into the possibility that in this particular case arbitration conceptually based on the Roman law was employed as the means of dispute resolution. donekle na rimsko-kanonski proces. /

Lovran ; Mošćenice ; granica ; razgraničenje ; spor ; novi vijek ; rimsko pravo ; arbitraža ; ius commune

nije evidentirano