Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1029632

Clinician’s opinion about critical risk results proposed by the Croatian Chamber of Medical Biochemists


Šonjić, Pavica; Nikler, Ana; Vuljanić, Dora; Dukić, Lora; Šimundić, Ana-Maria
Clinician’s opinion about critical risk results proposed by the Croatian Chamber of Medical Biochemists // Biochemia Medica: The journal of The Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 29 (2019), 3; 030711, 9 doi:10.11613/bm.2019.030711 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)


Naslov
Clinician’s opinion about critical risk results proposed by the Croatian Chamber of Medical Biochemists

Autori
Šonjić, Pavica ; Nikler, Ana ; Vuljanić, Dora ; Dukić, Lora ; Šimundić, Ana-Maria

Izvornik
Biochemia Medica: The journal of The Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine (1330-0962) 29 (2019), 3; 030711, 9

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni

Ključne riječi
Critical results ; survey ; post-analytical phase ; laboratory management

Sažetak
Abstract INTRODUCTION: It has been recommended that each laboratory modify their critical result reporting practices to reflect the clinical needs of their patient populations. The aim of this survey was to assess how well critical laboratory values defined by the Croatian Chamber of Medical Biochemists (CCMB) correspond to the needs of the physicians at University hospital "Sveti Duh" (Zagreb, Croatia). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a survey among physicians from five departments in our hospital. Physicians were asked general questions about critical risk results (if and how they want to be informed). A list of critical risk results defined by the CCMB was offered and physicians were asked to revise the existing critical risk results and suggest adding new parameters. Obtained data were presented as numbers. Where the number of observations was low, ratios were used. RESULTS: Survey response rate was 43% (52/121). Majority (48/52) wants to be informed of critical risk results, either personally (31/48) or through a colleague (32/48). They prefer to be informed about critical risk results of prothrombin time, platelet count, haemoglobin, glucose, creatinine, sodium and potassium. Revisions in the CCMB critical risk result list are proposed by 13 out of 48 physicians. Neonatologists approved the CCMB's list. CONCLUSIONS: Although most critical risk results defined by the CCMB correspond well to the needs of the physicians in our hospital, some revisions are necessary to meet the particular needs of individual departments. Communication of critical risk results to those who have requested laboratory testing is highly appreciated practice.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Kliničke medicinske znanosti



POVEZANOST RADA


Ustanove
Farmaceutsko-biokemijski fakultet, Zagreb,
Klinička bolnica "Sveti Duh"

Časopis indeksira:


  • Current Contents Connect (CCC)
  • Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
    • Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
    • SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
  • Scopus
  • MEDLINE


Citati