Nalazite se na CroRIS probnoj okolini. Ovdje evidentirani podaci neće biti pohranjeni u Informacijskom sustavu znanosti RH. Ako je ovo greška, CroRIS produkcijskoj okolini moguće je pristupi putem poveznice www.croris.hr
izvor podataka: crosbi !

Analysis of two xenograft materials after socket preservation – Preliminary histological findings (CROSBI ID 681852)

Prilog sa skupa u časopisu | sažetak izlaganja sa skupa | međunarodna recenzija

Karl, Matej ; Perić Kačarević, Željka ; Matijević Marko ; Ivanišević Zrinka ; Pejakić, Marija ; Matijević, Nikola Analysis of two xenograft materials after socket preservation – Preliminary histological findings // Clinical oral implants research. 2019. str. 178-178 doi: 10.1111/clr.136_13509

Podaci o odgovornosti

Karl, Matej ; Perić Kačarević, Željka ; Matijević Marko ; Ivanišević Zrinka ; Pejakić, Marija ; Matijević, Nikola

engleski

Analysis of two xenograft materials after socket preservation – Preliminary histological findings

Background Shape and volume of the alveolar bone are determined by the shape and position of the roots. Resorption is the inevitable physiological process following tooth extraction. In the aftermath, bone volume is reduced and the morphology of the ridge has changed. To prevent resorption and maintain alveolar ridge macro and microarchitecture socket preservation technique is used. Empty alveolar is augmented with substitute material to prevent excess resorption. Aim/Hypothesis The aim of this study is to evaluate histological and histomorphometrical findings of two different xenografts after socket preservation in patients with indications for delayed implant placement. Material and Methods The study is designed as two phased controlled, randomized study. In the first phase, 40 patients that qualified for participation in the research were divided into two groups. The first group underwent tooth extractions and socket augmentation with cerabone®(Botiss Biomaterials GmbH). Sockets were covered with a resorbable collagen membrane (Jason membrane®, Botiss Biomaterials GmbH). The other group had a socket preservation technique done using BioOss® (Geistlich Biomaterials Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH) and the defects were also covered using Jason membrane®. In the second phase, after the healing period of six months and prior to implant placement, bone biopsies were harvested using trephine burrs. Samples were fixed in 4% formaldehyde, dehydrated with alcohol and put in paraffine. Staining was done using toluidine blue and analyzed under the light microscope. Results Both materials excelled in terms of clinical handling and lack of postoperative complications. So far the analysis of both materials showed incorporation of the xenograft particles into newly formed bone without inflammatory reaction. Conclusion and Clinical Implications Keeping in mind the limitations of this study as well as the preliminary nature of this presentation, it can be concluded that both materials showed excellent characteristics when used as substitutes in socket preservation technique.

xenograft ; dental implantology ; histology

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

Podaci o prilogu

178-178.

2019.

nije evidentirano

objavljeno

10.1111/clr.136_13509

Podaci o matičnoj publikaciji

Clinical oral implants research

0905-7161

1600-0501

Podaci o skupu

28th Annual Scientific Meeting of the European Association for Osseointegration

poster

26.09.2019-28.09.2019

Lisabon, Portugal

Povezanost rada

Temeljne medicinske znanosti

Poveznice
Indeksiranost