Nalazite se na CroRIS probnoj okolini. Ovdje evidentirani podaci neće biti pohranjeni u Informacijskom sustavu znanosti RH. Ako je ovo greška, CroRIS produkcijskoj okolini moguće je pristupi putem poveznice www.croris.hr
izvor podataka: crosbi

Comparison of major depression diagnostic classification probability using the SCID, CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews among women in pregnancy or postpartum: An individual participant data meta‐analysis (CROSBI ID 269595)

Prilog u časopisu | izvorni znanstveni rad | međunarodna recenzija

Levis, Brooke ; McMillan, Dean ; Sun, Ying ; He, Chen ; Rice, Danielle B. ; Krishnan, Ankur ; Wu, Yin ; Azar, Marleine ; Sanchez, Tatiana A. ; Chiovitti, Matthew J. et al. Comparison of major depression diagnostic classification probability using the SCID, CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews among women in pregnancy or postpartum: An individual participant data meta‐analysis // International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 1803 (2019), e1803, 11. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1803

Podaci o odgovornosti

Levis, Brooke ; McMillan, Dean ; Sun, Ying ; He, Chen ; Rice, Danielle B. ; Krishnan, Ankur ; Wu, Yin ; Azar, Marleine ; Sanchez, Tatiana A. ; Chiovitti, Matthew J. ; Bhandari, Parash Mani ; Neupane, Dipika ; Saadat, Nazanin ; Riehm, Kira E. ; Imran, Mahrukh ; Boruff, Jill T. ; Cuijpers, Pim ; Gilbody, Simon ; Ioannidis, John P.A. ; Kloda, Lorie A. ; Patten, Scott B. ; Shrier, Ian ; Ziegelstein, Roy C. ; Comeau, Liane ; Mitchell, Nicholas D. ; Tonelli, Marcello ; Vigod, Simone N. ; Aceti, Franca ; Alvarado, Rubén ; Alvarado‐Esquivel, Cosme ; Bakare, Muideen O. ; Barnes, Jacqueline ; Beck, Cheryl Tatano ; Bindt, Carola ; Boyce, Philip M. ; Bunevicius, Adomas ; Couto, Tiago Castro e ; Chaudron, Linda H. ; Correa, Humberto ; Figueiredo, Felipe Pinheiro ; Eapen, Valsamma ; Fernandes, Michelle ; Figueiredo, Barbara ; Fisher, Jane R.W. ; Garcia‐Esteve, Lluïsa ; Giardinelli, Lisa ; Helle, Nadine ; Howard, Louise M. ; Khalifa, Dina Sami ; Kohlhoff, Jane ; Kusminskas, Laima ; Kozinszky, Zoltán ; Lelli, Lorenzo ; Leonardou, Angeliki A. ; Lewis, Beth A. ; Maes, Michael ; Meuti, Valentina ; Nakić Radoš, Sandra ; Navarro García, Purificación ; Nishi, Daisuke ; Okitundu Luwa E‐Andjafono, Daniel ; Robertson‐ Blackmore, Emma ; Rochat, Tamsen J. ; Rowe, Heather J. ; Siu, Bonnie W.M. ; Skalkidou, Alkistis ; Stein, Alan ; Stewart, Robert C. ; Su, Kuan‐Pin ; Sundström‐Poromaa, Inger ; Tadinac, Meri ; Tandon, S. Darius ; Tendais, Iva ; Thiagayson, Pavaani ; Töreki, Annamária ; Torres‐Giménez, Anna ; Tran, Thach D. ; Trevillion, Kylee ; Turner, Katherine ; Vega‐ Dienstmaier, Johann M. ; Wynter, Karen ; Yonkers, Kimberly A. ; Benedetti, Andrea ; Thombs, Brett D.

engleski

Comparison of major depression diagnostic classification probability using the SCID, CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews among women in pregnancy or postpartum: An individual participant data meta‐analysis

Objectives: A previous individual participant data meta-analysis (IPDMA) identified differences in major depression classification rates between different diagnostic interviews, controlling for depressive symptoms on the basis of the Patient HealthQuestionnaire-9. We aimed to determine whether similar results would be seen in a different population, using studies that administered the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in pregnancy or postpartum. Methods: Data accrued for an EPDS diagnostic accuracy IPDMA were analysed. Binomial generalised linear mixed models were fit to compare depression classification odds for the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), CompositeInternational Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), and Structured Clinical Interview for DSM(SCID), controlling for EPDS scores and participant characteristics. Results:Among fully structured interviews, the MINI (15 studies, 2, 532 participants, 342 major depression cases) classified depression more often than the CIDI (3 studies, 2, 948 participants, 194 major depression cases ; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.21, 11.43]). Compared with the semistructured SCID(28 studies, 7, 403 participants, 1, 027 major depression cases), odds with the CIDI(interaction aOR = 0.88, 95% CI [0.85, 0.92]) and MINI (interaction aOR = 0.95, 95%CI [0.92, 0.99]) increased less as EPDS scores increased. Conclusion: Different interviews may not classify major depression equivalently.

depressive disorders, diagnostic interviews ; Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale ; individualparticipant data meta-analysis ; major depression

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

Podaci o izdanju

1803

2019.

e1803

11

objavljeno

1049-8931

1557-0657

10.1002/mpr.1803

Povezanost rada

Kliničke medicinske znanosti, Psihologija

Poveznice
Indeksiranost