Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1016150

Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Hernia Repair Versus Open Lichtenstein Hernia Repair: Results and Complications


Vidović, Dinko; Kirac, Iva; Glavan, Elizabet; Filipović-Čugura, Jaksa; Ledinsky, Mario; Bekavac-Bešlin, Miroslav
Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Hernia Repair Versus Open Lichtenstein Hernia Repair: Results and Complications // Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 17 (2007), 5; 585-590 doi:10.1089/lap.2006.0186 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, ostalo)


Naslov
Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Hernia Repair Versus Open Lichtenstein Hernia Repair: Results and Complications

Autori
Vidović, Dinko ; Kirac, Iva ; Glavan, Elizabet ; Filipović-Čugura, Jaksa ; Ledinsky, Mario ; Bekavac-Bešlin, Miroslav

Izvornik
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (1092-6429) 17 (2007), 5; 585-590

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, ostalo

Ključne riječi
Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Hernia Repair

Sažetak
Whereas open Lichtenstein inguinal herniorrhaphy is generally accepted as a safe, well-understood method with a high success rate, the laparoscopic repair of a inguinal hernia is a fairly recent technique. Although the laparoscopic approach to a hernia repair procedure is associated with less pain and faster recovery than open repair, many surgeons are not familiar with this technique owing to technical demands and a long learning curve. This study compares the results and complications between open tension-free mesh (Lichtenstein) repair and laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) repair. The study cohort was comprised of 345 consecutive patients who underwent an inguinal herniorraphy procedure. An open hernia repair was performed on one group of patients (n = 233), whereas TEP repair was performed on the other (n = 112), and then the comparison of intra- and postoperative complications and results obtained from both techniques was done. The mean hospital stay was similar in both groups. The average operative time in the TEP group was 58.6 ± 18.1 minutes, and the average operative time in the open group was 58.2 ± 17.8 minutes. There was no difference in postoperative complication rates between the two groups, except for urinary retention, which patients who underwent TEP repair were more likely to get. The following major complications were recorded: 2 cases of urinary bladder perforation—1 during TEP repair and the other during Lichtenstein repair, but both with good postoperative outcome—and 1 case of pneumothorax, which occurred during the TEP procedure. Despite the fact that TEP is a demanding procedure, it may be performed efficiently with an acceptable operating time and a low complication rate.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Časopis indeksira:


  • Current Contents Connect (CCC)
  • Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
    • Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
    • SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
  • Scopus
  • MEDLINE


Citati